Capella FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Capella FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Name
Capella university
NURS-FPX4000 Developing a Nursing Perspective
Prof. Name
Date
Applying Research Spersistentkills
One of the most critical and challenges in the healthcare system is the effective management of chronic diseases. Conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease require continuous medical attention and active patient participation, placing significant demands on healthcare providers and systems. Nurses are uniquely positioned to address these challenges through patient education, continuous monitoring, care coordination, and the promotion of healthy behavior changes.
The professional relevance of this issue is substantial, as chronic diseases account for the majority of hospital admissions and healthcare-related expenditures. Wearable health technologies offer a transformative approach to supporting patient self-management by enabling real-time data collection and streamlining chronic care delivery across both inpatient and outpatient settings. Managing chronic diseases is a central concern in modern healthcare and a foundational aspect of professional nursing practice. These conditions require long-term strategies that go beyond episodic care, emphasizing the need for sustained patient education and lifestyle interventions.
Nurses play a vital role in this process due to their consistent patient interactions, ability to integrate care across multidisciplinary teams, and expertise in empowering patients to take control of their own health. Effective chronic disease management improves patient outcomes, reduces hospital readmissions, and decreases healthcare costs—aligning directly with the core responsibilities of nurses in both clinical and community health settings. A deep understanding of this problem is essential for nursing professionals who lead initiatives in care planning, disease prevention, and the promotion of long-term wellness among diverse populations (Zangger et al., 2023).
Article Selection Process
The research process began by utilizing Capella University’s library databases to locate peer-reviewed articles focused on the management of chronic diseases and the use of wearable technology. Databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were accessed to gather recent studies published within the past five years. The keyword combinations used included: “chronic disease management,” “wearable devices,” “digital health,” “telemedicine,” and “self-management.”
A rigorous selection process was followed, emphasizing peer-reviewed sources that were relevant to the nursing profession and demonstrated clear applicability to chronic illness care. Only articles written in English, published between 2020 and 2024, and containing empirical research findings were considered. All three selected articles met these criteria, ensuring both scholarly credibility and up-to-date relevance, with publication years ranging from 2022 to 2024.
Each of the chosen studies contributes valuable insights to the topic. The first article by Mattison et al. (2022) presents a systematic review on the impact of wearable technology on health outcomes for patients with chronic diseases. The second article by Jafleh et al. (2024) explores the broad application of wearables in monitoring and managing chronic conditions across various medical fields. The third article by Zangger et al. (2023) synthesizes data from over 130 randomized controlled trials to evaluate both the benefits and potential risks of digital health interventions that promote physical activity among individuals with chronic illnesses. All three articles reinforce evidence-based practice and offer strong relevance to modern nursing care.
Assessing Credibility
Credibility was established through a careful evaluation of each journal’s peer-review status, the qualifications of the authors, and the soundness of their research methodologies. All three sources originate from reputable medical or health journals and utilize systematic methods, including PRISMA protocols and meta-analytic techniques. Relevance was confirmed by each article’s direct alignment with the identified keywords and the central theme of chronic disease self-management, digital interventions, and patient outcomes. Assessing the validity of research sources is a crucial step in upholding the integrity of both academic scholarship and clinical decision-making.
The authors of the selected articles possess advanced academic degrees and are affiliated with respected academic and medical institutions, reinforcing the credibility and scholarly merit of their work. Each article is published in a peer-reviewed journal with a clear mission to disseminate evidence-based and clinically applicable research—such as the Journal of Medical Internet Research and Cureus, both known for their focus on healthcare innovation and digital health technologies.
The peer-review process itself—where independent experts rigorously assess submissions before publication—ensures adherence to high standards in research design, analysis, and practical relevance. Accessing these articles through the Capella University Library further guarantees that the sources are not only peer-reviewed and valid but also free from the commercial bias that can often be found on the open internet. The library’s access to high-quality academic databases supports nursing professionals in making informed clinical decisions grounded in current, reliable, and evidence-based research.
Annotated Bibliographies
Jafleh, E. A., Alnaqbi, F. A., Almaeeni, H. A., Faqeeh, S., Alzaabi, M. A., & Al Zaman, K. (2024). The role of wearable devices in chronic disease monitoring and patient care: A comprehensive review. Cureus, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68921
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11461032/
This review examines wearable medical devices assisting in monitoring for chronic diseases in cardiology, endocrinology, and mental health. The authors detail how devices like continuous glucose monitors, smartwatches, and wristband blood pressure monitors contribute to enhanced real-time patient care and patient engagement. Their findings establish enhanced patient compliance, detection of the disease, and outcomes in rehabilitation, as well as management concerns about data accuracy, privacy, and cost. Jafleh et al. (2024) conclude wearables have the potential to transform managing chronic disease, as long as technological and ethical issues are addressed.
This piece makes valuable contributions to our understanding of how such devices enhance outcomes and allow for individualized care. This paper was chosen due to its broad overview of wearable technologies in several chronic conditions, providing a wide perspective on their use in monitoring patients. The article helps my research because it highlights how real-time feedback and constant monitoring enhance adherence to patients and personalized care. It is consistent with how technology can improve chronic disease self-management when used properly. The authors, however, cite continuous issues with data privacy, affordability, and device accuracy, which call for more innovation and regulation in wearable tech.
Capella FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Mattison, G., Canfell, O., Forrester, D., Dobbins, C., Smith, D., Töyräs, J., & Sullivan, C. (2022). The influence of wearables on health care outcomes in chronic disease: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(7), e36690. https://doi.org/10.2196/36690
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9288104/
This systematic review ascertains wearables’ influence on healthcare outcomes in patients with long-term conditions. This research examined 30 studies with more than 2,400 study participants, including conditions like type 2 diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, and persistent pain. Outcomes were mapped to the Quadruple Aim model—patient experience, health outcomes, cost, and provider experience. Half of the studies achieved positive outcomes, whereas the remainder achieved limited or mixed outcomes, and they have indicated the necessity for further empirical evidence.
According to Mattison et al. (2022), wearables hold promise and still await validation and workflow integration. This source provides richness by uncovering the opportunities and constraints of current wearable technology implementation in healthcare. The study was selected because of its systematic review of wearable technologies with the Quadruple Aim model, an evidence-based approach for determining healthcare value. This article supports my argument by recognizing wearable implementation’s potential benefits and practical limitations, particularly regarding health outcomes and workflow integration. It is a realistic perspective on the current applications and what is needed for wider acceptance. A gap that is realized is the absence of long-term studies that assess the lasting improvements in chronic disease management and patient-provider cooperation.
Capella FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Zangger, G., Bricca, A., Liaghat, B., Juhl, C. B., Mortensen, S. R., Andersen, R. M., & Damsted, C. (2023). Benefits and harms of digital health interventions promoting physical activity in people with chronic conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e46439. https://doi.org/10.2196/46439 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10359919/
This systematic review analyzes the influence of digital health interventions, such as wearable devices, on physical health and quality of life among people with long-term conditions. With the review of 130 randomized trials, the study revealed slight but considerable improvements in physical function and physical activity, specifically at the conclusion of the intervention. Zangger et al. (2023) identify a slightly higher risk of non-serious side effects but no rise in serious harm. This wide-ranging synthesis confirms the effectiveness of digital interventions to improve health outcomes and self-management.
With its extensive sample and sophisticated subgroup analysis, it is a worthwhile contribution to the literature of managing long-term conditions. The paper was incorporated due to the most extensive sample size and robust statistical analysis of digital health interventions encouraging physical activity in chronically ill populations. The study’s results support the perspective since they show only moderate yet meaningful improvements in patient outcomes, justifying the clinical value of wearables. It also acknowledges minor non-serious side effects and gives a balanced description of the benefits and risks.
Summary of the Findings
Conducting research for this annotated bibliography deepened my understanding of the growing impact digital health technologies have on managing chronic diseases. Through careful investigation and analysis, I gained clearer insight into how wearable technology can empower patients, support healthcare providers, and reduce strain on healthcare systems. Each article provided a unique perspective, from broad reviews to targeted analysis of outcomes and the issues with implementation. It also emphasized critical thinking in determining the credibility and relevance of sources.
As digital tools are being incorporated more into healthcare, nurses must be up-to-date and competent in evaluating these technologies to guarantee proper use in practice. In the future, the skills acquired from this research will be critical in assessing innovations and adopting evidence-based practices to improve patient care.From these articles, I have learned that wearable technologies are a lot in dealing with chronic diseases. They offer real-time monitoring, involve the patients, and facilitate long-term behavioral changes (Jafleh et al., 2024). As for wearables, Mattison et al. (2022) spoke about their potential and the limitations and offered to integrate them into clinical workflows.
Zangger et al. (2023) confirmed that digital interventions may lead to positive physical activity and function changes, but side effects may be reported. Working on an annotated bibliography helped me learn how to assess each study’s credibility, relevance, and quality of research. This process enhanced my skills in synthesizing and using evidence in nursing. It also helped to ensure that my writing was focused and evidence-based. It helped by providing a clear structure to organize my sources, connect them to my research question, and identify key themes and gaps that guide future writing and inquiry. Going forward, annotated bibliographies will remain a resource for my research as they help me with source management, knowledge gaps, and quality academic and clinical writing.
References
Jafleh, E. A., Alnaqbi, F. A., Almaeeni, H. A., Faqeeh, S., Alzaabi, M. A., & Al Zaman, K. (2024). The role of wearable devices in chronic disease monitoring and patient care: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68921
Mattison, G., Canfell, O., Forrester, D., Dobbins, C., Smith, D., Töyräs, J., & Sullivan, C. (2022). The influence of wearables on health care outcomes in chronic disease: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(7), e36690. https://doi.org/10.2196/36690
Capella FPX 4000 Assessment 2
Zangger, G., Bricca, A., Liaghat, B., Juhl, C. B., Mortensen, S. R., Andersen, R. M., & Damsted, C. (2023). Benefits and harms of digital health interventions promoting physical activity in people with chronic conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e46439. https://doi.org/10.2196/46439