Capella 4020 Assessment 4 Improvement Plan Tool Kit

Capella 4020 Assessment 4 Improvement Plan Tool Kit Name Capella university NURS-FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety Prof. Name Date Introduction – Improvement Plan Tool Kit Medication errors cause unwanted damage to individuals, healthcare professionals, and healthcare systems. Nurses must recognize and promote strategies that enhance drug administration safety. A safety enhancement strategy necessitates an insignificant quantity of knowledge that can be shared among the relevant individuals (Amaniyan et al., 2020). A Medication Administration Error (MAE) improvement plan tool kit is created in this assessment. Google Scholar, PubMed Central, Capella Online Library, and CINAHL databases were used to generate this tool kit. This resource tool kit aims to help nursing staff and other healthcare providers execute the drug safety improvement plan with a comprehensive understanding and awareness of the associated ideas to accomplish effective outcomes.  Resource Tool Kit – Implementation and Sustainability  This resource kit is divided into four groups, allowing nurses to seek guidance from the most pertinent resources. These areas are: a)  Implementation of quality medication administration b) Best practices of MAE reporting and improved patient safety  c) Evidence-based strategies for safety improvement plan d) Staff-led interventions in medication safety Implementation of Quality Medication Administration Savva, G., Papastavrou, E., Charalambous, A., Vryonides, S., & Merkouris, A. (2022). Exploring nurses’ perceptions of medication error risk factors: Findings from a sequential qualitative study. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 9, 23333936221094857. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936221094857 This resource used a prospective observational study method to determine the incidence, and nature and identify the factors associated with MAEs. This study also focuses on interventions to reduce the risk factors. The resource group focuses on an improvement plan to enhance patient safety. This study claimed that most MAEs occur in intravenous doses of medications with 35% of total MAEs. The study has highlighted various MAEs attributed risk factors. One of the significant factors is staff, including nurses-related risk factors such as knowledge, expertise, patient medical condition, workload, and poor communication among staff members. Procedure-related mistakes are also common during the medication delivery process. Exclusions and deviations from safe medication administration protocols are typical procedural mistakes. This study can assist nurses and healthcare staff discover more about the factors leading to MAEs. Comprehension of these risk variables can assist them in finding similar aspects in their organizations and implementing appropriate safety enhancement programs to achieve and sustain reforms. Furthermore, intravenous medication errors can be fatal to patients. Therefore, this study aids medical staff and nurses in their continual efforts to enhance the standard of care and guarantee the safety of patients. Capella 4020 Assessment 4 Improvement Plan Tool Kit Rozenblum, R., Rodriguez-Monguio, R., Volk, L. A., Forsythe, K. J., Myers, S., McGurrin, M., Williams, D. H., Bates, D. W., Schiff, G., & Seoane-Vazquez, E. (2020). Using a machine learning system to identify and prevent medication prescribing errors: A clinical and cost analysis evaluation. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 46(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.09.008  The authors investigated using a machine learning system to identify and prevent pharmaceutical dispensing mistakes. Furthermore, the article intends to assess medical procedures and economic implications following the implementation of this technology-based approach. This study showed that this technology-based method is crucial for reducing errors. It has detected a significant reduction in prescription errors. Preventing MAEs resulted in lower expenditures. This demonstrated that machine learning systems can generate clinically acceptable drug mistake alarms, which conventional clinical decision-support tools commonly fail to do. This technique can detect drug errors in advance. It helps the healthcare providers in developing strategies for drug delivery improvement plans.  Brito D. A., M., Carneiro, C. T., Bezerra, M. A. R., Rocha, R. C., & Da Rocha, S. S. (2022). Effective communication strategies among health professionals in neonatology: An integrative review. Enfermeria Global, 21(3), 578-591. https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.502051 Capella 4020 Assessment 4 Improvement Plan Tool Kit This study examines methods for improving communication among multidisciplinary groups. The study emphasizes the significance of efficient interaction in promoting patient safety in hospitals. Poor communication results in increased adverse events of MAEs. The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified efficient collaboration among professionals as the second global aim for improving the security of patients and the standard of treatment. The authors suggest inter-professional communication enhancement strategies. These strategies will improve patient safety. The implementation of communication devices, exchange reporting, direct discussion, and the incorporation of efficient communication strategies in training sessions are all examples of successful communication approaches. Regular discussions, multidisciplinary rounds, verification, and quick responses to interdisciplinary teammates are also effective strategies. The absence of standardization and insufficient recording of information about patients in the healthcare record are two challenges to successful communication. The authors support the procedures described to ensure effective interaction within the multidisciplinary group and boost patient safety. Efficient communication leads to better care. This article is a valuable asset for nurses adopting pharmaceutical quality improvement strategies. Best Practices of Medication Errors Reporting and Improved Patient Safety Afaya, A., Konlan, K. D., & Kim Do, H. (2021). Improving patient safety through identifying barriers to reporting medication administration errors among nurses: An integrative review. BioMed Central Health Services Research, 21, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07187-5 The significance of developing measures to mitigate medication-related damage is discussed in this article. Nurses need to report errors to reduce errors and enhance patient safety. The researchers conducted an integrative study to identify hurdles to nurses reporting MAEs. The investigators examined a variety of primary resources, and two significant concepts developed: organization and profession challenges, and behavioral barriers. A lack of an adequate reporting system, ambiguous definitions of pharmaceutical errors, and organizational behaviors have been identified as organizational hurdles. The absence of a proper MAE reporting system rendered reporting procedures difficult, mainly using the MAE reporting form, which is a primary hurdle to reporting and documenting MAEs.  There is an imprecise description of ME inside the healthcare system, and differences over what should be considered reporting are a barrier to reporting MAEs.  The negative response of the administrators toward nursing staff results in the lack of error reporting and the absence of feedback after error investigation. Personal concerns like fear of embarrassment and job loss are professional and behavior impediments. Other challenges include a lack of awareness about errors and patient damage from the MAEs.  This resource’s knowledge can assist healthcare systems and stakeholders address challenges to

Capella 4020 Assessment 3 Improvement Plan in Service Presentation

Capella 4020 Assessment 3 Improvement Plan in Service Presentation Name Capella university NURS-FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety Prof. Name Date Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation Greetings! My name is Priscilla, and I’m here to give you the safe medication administration improvement plan, which will address Medication Administration Errors (MAEs) that result in Adverse Drug Events (ADEs), as mentioned in assessment two. Outline This presentation will cover the following topics: Health care problem Purpose and goals of the in-service session Need and process to improve safety outcomes Role and importance of audience Resources and activities for engagement Medication Administration Errors  MAEs are defined as errors that occur during drug administration. The administration procedure is the final step in pharmaceutical management before final documentation. Most of these errors are made by nurses, the most significant medical personnel delivering medications to patients (Asefa et al., 2021). These errors can arise because of the administration of the incorrect medicine, dosage, or procedure at the incorrect time or to the incorrect patient (Ayorinde & Alabi, 2019). Medication administration must be done safely to safeguard patient safety and avoid ADEs. ADEs can cause mild to severe side effects, leading to in serious complications or mortality. In medical facilities, ADEs are responsible for adverse patient safety effects (Bangwal et al., 2020). The safe drug administration improvement plan is a holistic effort aimed at addressing the issues raised by MAEs. Purpose and Goals of In-Service Session Purpose This in-service session on safe drug administration, focusing on reducing MAEs that cause ADEs, improves nurses’ understanding, abilities, and compliance with standard procedures (Wondmieneh et al., 2020). The session’s objective is to equip nurses with updated knowledge on ADEs to prevent the adverse effects of medication interactions caused by MAEs. The implementation of Electronic Health Record (EHR) and Barcoding Medication Administration (BCMA) systems assists in the reduction of MAEs and enables nurses to manage ADEs better (Grailey et al., 2023). Nurses can render informed judgments during medication administration if they better understand the adverse effects of MAEs, particularly ADEs. The training session encourages nurses to practice analytical abilities or strategies when administering drugs. Nurses can help to prevent adverse occurrences by recognizing and minimizing risks through their expertise (Marufu et al., 2022). Goals The following objectives are pertinent and attainable during the in-service session: Provide nurses with easily accessible tools, such as pharmaceutical reference guides, medication interaction databases, and organizational regulations and guidelines, to support informed decision-making and MAE management (Shahmoradi et al., 2021). Nurses will be aware of high-alert or complex drugs, their particular managing demands, administering practices, and measures to reduce the possibility of MAEs (Zyoud et al., 2019). By the end of the session, nurses will understand error prevention strategies and tools, including BCMA, verification, and digital prescriptions through EHR systems, to improve proficiency and validation procedures during administering drugs (Lunt & Mathieson, 2020). The session will encourage nurses to report and gain insight into drug errors. The seminar will emphasize the significance of report systems for incidents, for example, the use of a Medication Error Reporting System (MERS). It also emphasize on the implementation of preventative measures to avoid such mistakes in the future. (Afaya et al., 2021). Need and Process to Improve Safety Outcomes Need  To prevent ADEs, there is a need to enhance safety outcomes related to MAEs (Kuklik et al., 2019). According to research, approximately 7000 deaths occur in the United States because of MAEs, with almost 400,000 occurrences of avoidable patient harm. MAEs caused ADEs in 25% of those admitted to hospitals. According to Fathy et al. (2020), the global financial effect of MAE costs approximately 42 billion dollars annually. This evidence highlights the critical need for comprehensive strategies to reform the medical sector to provide safety and more effective care. It is critical to deal with MAEs holistically and establish procedures that successfully reduce the incidence of avoidable MAEs, which result in ADEs and compromise patient safety (Kuklik et al., 2019). Process The safety improvement process intends to develop suitable medication administration practices to minimize ADEs in medical centers. This approach comprises evidence-based efforts to encourage patient safety. The first stage in the process is providing educational opportunities and training to medical staff to acquire the appropriate knowledge and competencies. Drug security expertise and comprehension also encourage involvement in continuing learning activities (Farzi et al., 2020). The second step is the execution of the Medication Reconciliation (MR) strategy. The MR involves assessing new drug prescription to those already in use, checking correctness, and eliminating disparities.  MR has been shown to help lower MAEs and prevent potential ADEs during hospitalization. Nurses can help minimize adverse effects of medication and promote patient safety by doing MR carefully (Ceschi et al., 2020) In the third step of the process to improve safety, technological tools are employed to eliminate MERs and increase performance. Incorporating BCMA and EHR systems assists in lowering the probability of serious medical complications. Nurses can reliably validate medication codes and dispense medications to patients appropriately by using BCMA (Barakat & Franklin, 2020). Furthermore, drug administration processes are built using the Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) system. Nurses can use CPOE to describe pharmacological interactions to improve medication accuracy and avoid adverse events (Mogharbel et al., 2021). The final step of the improvement process involves enhancing the culture for MAE reporting, learning, and continuous improvement and enabling nurses and other healthcare providers to report MAE incidents if they happen (Obaid et al., 2023). These strategies focused on improving interactions, such as structured communication tools and interdisciplinary training, to lessen drug delivery mistakes and improve patient safety. Nurses can reduce drug-related hazards and promote safer drug administration methods by taking part in open communication and cooperating with other medical personnel (Dirik et al., 2019). Role and Importance of Audience To develop a successful improvement plan based on safe drug delivery, properly communicating the audience’s role is critical. The audience’s awareness of their duties can be improved by open communication, helps in the effectiveness of the plan (Dirik et al., 2019). Policymakers and the board of director’s members must be involved in developing supportive guidelines, distributing adequate funds, and offering strategic leadership. Their dedication and participation in the improvement plan are critical to its accomplishment, as they

Capella 4020 Assessment 1 Enhancing Quality and Safety

Capella 4020 Assessment 1 Enhancing Quality and Safety Name Capella university NURS-FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety Prof. Name Date Enhancing Quality and Safety Medication errors are the most significant factor of preventable patient harm in the global medical care setting. Medication Administration Errors (MAEs) are one of the more frequently occurring medical mistakes, which have severe implications for patients, medical personnel, and medical organizations (Wondmieneh et al., 2020). The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that the worldwide economic impact of drug errors is anticipated to be nearly 42 billion dollars yearly (Asefa et al., 2021). MAEs cause the mortality of around 7000 patients and cause approximately 400,000 occurrences of unnecessary patient damage in the United States each year (Wondmieneh et al., 2020). This study will examine a case illustrating the drug administration’s safety and quality challenges.  Scenario  Mr. John, a 52-year-old man with a diagnosis of cardiac myopathy, was hospitalized for prolonged care and treatments. A mistake in medicine administration happened during Mr. John’s hospitalization. Instead of his prescribed drugs, he was provided with the wrong medication by a nurse who misinterpreted the medication’s prescription. Tragically, the mistake was ignored until Mr. John’s condition progressively declined.  The drug he acquired by mistake had a detrimental interaction with his other medicines. He had an elevated cardiovascular rate and breathing problems, which exacerbated his condition. The physician and the medical professionals evaluated Mr. John’s condition, and the MAE was found as a possible cause. Mr. John was then given immediate medical attention to help manage his health.  This tragic event reminded the medical professionals in the healthcare setting of the importance of the safety of the medication.  Factors Leading to Patient Safety Risk MAEs can cause severe health hazards to patients. Many factors contribute to patient safety hazards during pharmaceutical delivery. Poor teamwork and inadequate communication and interaction among doctors and nurses are some of the contributing factors to MAEs. Lack of collaboration among medical personnel can result in medication errors (Tiwary et al., 2019). Mr. John’s medication was administered incorrectly due to a misunderstanding and lack of communication among nurses and specialists. Misunderstanding and a lack of multidisciplinary cooperation result in insufficient information exchange among physicians, nurse practitioners, and pharmacy professionals, which can harm patients and increase medical expenditures. To prevent such events, efficient interaction is vital (Tiwary et al., 2019). Other recognized reasons for MAEs include errors in written correspondence, such as prescription drugs and record-keeping, drug delivery and inventory problems, such as pharmacy errors in dispensing, and facility management of stock. According to various studies, excessive job stress of nurses contributes to MAEs (Ayorinde & Alabi, 2019).  However, the majority of MAEs impacting patients in hospitals happen at the bedside and arise when a drug dose is provided inappropriately (Ayorinde & Alabi, 2019). MAEs are more likely in patients who have complicated drug regimes. Many research investigations have found a link between pharmaceutical regimen complexity and an increased likelihood of mishaps (Jessurun et al., 2023). Mr. John’s history of cardiac myopathy most likely demanded an elaborate drug prescription. Using standardized verifying techniques can help reduce the chance of misunderstanding and mistakes. Medical professionals can minimize the chance of MAEs in people like Mr. John by highlighting the significance of verification of prescriptions (Jessurun et al., 2023). Solutions Based on Evidence-Based Best Practices  Increased incidents of MAE results in a financial burden on patient and the healthcare system. Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) educates medical professionals on the most effective drugs or medications for particular diseases (Patel et al., 2019). EBP allows clinicians to select medicines with fewer adverse drug reactions. EBP enables physicians to administer Mr. John’s drug regimen effectively. EBP can significantly reduce MAEs, such as duplicate and incorrect dosages, and save medical expenses (Ahsani et al., 2022). Here are several EBPs that can assist in reducing MAEs: Medication Error Reporting System Introducing the Medication Error Reporting System (MERS) aids in identifying potential sources or risk factors of drug mistakes. Medication error reporting provides valuable information highlighting areas that require improvement to enhance patient safety (Mutair et al., 2021). Additionally, MERS is essential for assisting in easily avoiding errors and their typical serious consequences. Through MERS, healthcare professionals can evaluate contributing and risk variables in MAEs and the frequency of prescription mistakes. This system is critical to avoiding medication adverse events (Mutair et al., 2021). Barcoding Medication Administration (BCMA) BCMA functions as a beneficial Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) to reduce medication errors. The BCMA technique can improve medicine delivery precision and effectiveness (Shitu et al., 2019). The scanning of barcodes verifies the drug information, guaranteeing the relevant patient, the right medicine, dosage, and mechanism is used. The BCMA system assists nurses in appropriately diagnosing patients and preventing MAEs. This approach enables hospitals and clinics to meet patient safety objectives (Mulac et al., 2021). Computerized Physicians’ Order Entry System (CPOE) The CPOE system helps nurses deliver medications currently functioning in the system. Using CPOE systems has been estimated to prevent around half of all medication errors (Jungreithmayr et al., 2021). A drug prescription should meet requirements such as legibility and accuracy to avoid MAEs. CPOE systems can significantly minimize unclear prescriptions and data exclusion, typical contributors to medication errors (Jungreithmayr et al., 2021). Medication Reconciliation (MR) MR is crucial to eliminate exclusion and replication errors, improper dosages or schedules, and harmful or adverse drug interactions. Adverse events can be reduced to improve patient safety by efficient MR, reducing the unwanted hospital stay of patients and mitigating healthcare costs (Chiewchantanakit et al., 2020). The MR strategy for Mr. John can help guarantee that his prescription information is updated during his hospitalization. This procedure involves contrasting his medicines with the drug prescription (Elbeddini et al., 2021). The Role of Nurses in Coordinate Care for Patient Safety Medication errors adversely affect patient safety. MAEs can result in extended hospital stays, incurring significant costs for medical facilities and individuals.  Nurses can avoid these additional expenditures by playing their role in coordinating care (Mileski et al., 2020). Nurses can follow evidence-based drug safety procedures such as the five rights of drug management, including the right patient, prescription drugs, dosage, met hod of administration, and timing. Nurses regularly give the right medicine

Capella 4020 Assessment 2 Root Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

Capella 4020 Assessment 2 Root Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan Name Capella university NURS-FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety Prof. Name Date Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan Root-cause analysis (RCA) is an approach that evolved in the medical field and is used to explore the direct and indirect contributing variables for a preventable adverse event and develop a prevention strategy (Kwok et al., 2020). The most common application of RCA in healthcare is in the analysis of Medication Administration Errors (MAEs), which contribute to Adverse Drug Events (ADE). ADE has adverse patient implications, ranging from insignificant negative outcomes to potentially fatal situations (Singh et al., 2023). MAEs resulted in a patient safety issue at the Vila Health Hospital. This study will investigate the root cause of the MAE incident, taking into account the factors that contributed to the problem. Furthermore, an evidence-based safety improvement plan will be developed based on the organization’s available resources to avoid such problems.  Root-cause analysis of medication administration errors One of the biggest causes of preventable patient damage in healthcare systems is inappropriate drug practices. The majority of these errors occur during the process of administration of drugs. Nurses are mainly accountable for MAEs (Wondmieneh et al., 2020). Lack of collaboration and records, a lack of medication interaction understanding, and inadequate instruction for patients result in MAEs that cause ADE (Guncag et al., 2021). By completing a comprehensive RCA, organizations can determine the sources of mistakes and design focused measures to avoid adverse events. A 52-year-old, Mr. Joseph, experienced adverse events due to MAEs. He was the patient of cardiac myopathy. During his hospital stay, the nurse misunderstood his handwritten medication prescription and gave him the wrong medicine, resulting in severe ADE, including increased cardiac rate and shortness of breath. It happens due to the injurious reaction of the wrong medicine with other drugs. The medication administration mistake committed by the nurse was an underlying concern. Poor standard of care and uncertain practices can result in significant death and disability in patients (Vaismoradi et al., 2020). To prevent repeated occurrences of severe drug reactions due to MAEs, it is critical to develop compatible guidelines for medication dispensing and highlight the importance of administering drug education (Vaismoradi et al., 2020). As a result, it is critical to recognize the elements contributing to the issue and develop an immediate safety improvement plan to address them. Elements Contributed to Safety Issues Assessing the primary cause of the patient protection concern, mainly Ms. Joseph’s MAE incident indicates various contributing variables relating to drug administration in the healthcare system. Inappropriate Medication Reconciliation (MR) and evaluation methods, such as the absence of complete drug records and accurate prescription histories, result in MAEs and harm the well-being of patients (Millichamp & Johnston, 2020). During nursing training, nurses acquire the five rights of administering medicines, which include the proper patient, prescription medicines, dosage, mode of delivery, and time. However, there are instances where nurses fail to adhere to this standard guideline, resulting in MAEs (Martyn et al., 2019). According to research, 38.6% of pharmaceutical mistakes were attributed to incorrect time management, while 27.5% were attributed to incorrect evaluation and prescription to the incorrect patient (Tsegaye et al., 2020). Capella 4020 Assessment 2 Root Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan The absence of defined standards for pharmaceutical prescribing, as well as clear recommendations and decision support systems, leads to dependence on human knowledge, which increases the risk of MAEs and adverse events (Alshahrani et al., 2021). Continuing professional education (CPD) is critical for nurses to promote and upgrade their expertise and abilities based on recent developments (Hakvoort et al., 2022). It is reported that improper or lack of training of nurses leads to the MAEs. According to research, 78.7% of MAEs are caused by inadequate education (Tsegaye et al., 2020). This evidence demonstrates that nurses with a limited understanding of medications can make mistakes during medication administration without identifying side effects that can compromise patient safety (Hakvoort et al., 2022). Application of Evidence-Based Strategies Evidence-based and standard interventions can tackle the incidents due to MAEs and the fundamental reasons indicated for these issues. The MR process is critical in encouraging an appropriate approach to drug administration. Hazardous occurrences can be decreased to promote patient safety through effective MR, minimizing unnecessary hospitalizations and lowering medical costs (Milanez-Azevedo et al., 2022). Integrating Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems with MR allows for the accessibility of correct and updated medication records. It assists in lowering healthcare administrative expenses by eliminating duplicate drug prescriptions or problems with duplication and related issues (Adane et al., 2019). Introducing the Medication Error Reporting System (MERS) assists with recognizing possible contributors or indicators for medication mistakes. MERS provides beneficial data by revealing issues that need improvement to increase patient safety (Karande et al., 2021). Moreover, this system is critical for readily minimizing mistakes and their associated ADR. MERS allows doctors and nurses to assess causative variables in the incidence of prescription mistakes. This framework prevents medication-related adverse reactions (Afaya et al., 2021). Capella 4020 Assessment 2 Root Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan Barcoding scanning or Barcoding Medication Administration (BCMA) system can aid in reducing ADE by improving medication administration. The BCMA approach promotes the accuracy and efficacy of drug distribution and administration. Scanning barcodes confirms the details of the medication, ensuring that the appropriate drug, dose, and procedure is employed. The BCMA program helps caregivers accurately assess patients to avoid MAEs. This method allows healthcare facilities to accomplish goals related to patient safety (Owens et al., 2020). Collaboration and coordination with pharmacists and health personnel can also assist patients with complex health issues in analyzing pharmaceutical prescriptions. Raising drug interaction awareness and instruction is essential in reducing MAEs (Jaam et al., 2021). To reduce MAEs and their impact on patient safety, comprehensive training sessions for medical professionals concentrating on drug interactions and medication administration are required (Vifladt et al., 2023). How Strategies Address Adverse Events Related to Medication Administration Error Evidence-based techniques will deal with the ADE associated with MAEs. Medical personnel can obtain detailed drug details by integrating EHR and BCMA (Owens et al., 2020). MERS assists in the identification of potential causes

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 4 Improvement Plan Tool Kit

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 4 Improvement Plan Tool Kit Name Capella university NURS FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety Prof. Name Date Improvement Plan Toolkit The improvement plan toolkit developed in this assessment aims to enhance understanding of the safety improvement plan for reducing patient identification errors among healthcare staff and the relevant workforce. As the Arnold Palmer Hospital has been facing patient identification errors lately, a safety improvement plan is developed in the previous assessment. To better understand this plan, the improvement plan toolkit is designed to comprise research-based evidence focusing on patient identification errors and a tailored safety improvement plan. The toolkit is built by delving into research articles and drawing relevant articles as evidence-based practices to prevent patient misidentification.  The four categories focusing on patient identification errors and safety improvement plans are patient identification and its significance in healthcare, procedures, and protocols to prevent patient identification, technology integration, and innovation and human-centered approaches towards correct patient identification. Patient Identification and its Significance in Healthcare Rahmawati, T. W., Sari, D. R., Ratri, D. R., & Hasyim, M. (2020). Patient identification in wards: What influences nurses’ complicance? Jurnal Medicoeticolegal Dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jmmr.92121  This article by Rahmawati et al. (2020) highlights the patient identification as a critical factor in patient safety. Moreover, it delves into the factors associated with low compliance with patient identification among nurses in inpatient settings. The article emphasizes the significance of patient identification with two identities: before diagnostic or therapeutic procedures and before administering medications and blood transfusions. It also highlights that patient identification is not limited to bracelet identifiers. Still, patient and family engagement in treatments by communicating with healthcare professionals should also be encouraged to promote a safety culture by reassuring patient identity. The article also states some stats on patient identification errors; for instance, the article mentioned that about 12 near misses in one hospital in 2019 occurred due to patient identification errors, showing the non-compliance of nurses towards patient identification protocols, procedures, and technologies. The root problems that lead to identification errors among patients identified by authors include lack of education and nurse awareness on patient identification, lack of implementation of SOPs for patient identification, late printing of bracelet identifiers, and lack of documentation of patients’ lists for registration. These factors have led to low compliance with patient identification among ward nurses. This resource is helpful for nurses to understand patient identification and why patient identification occurs in the first place. Moreover, this article has valuable data on factors required to promote patient safety by accurate patient identification and factors that trigger patient misidentification. This article can be valuable for all healthcare and non-clinical staff to understand patient safety, patient identification, and factors contributing to patient identification errors. NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 4 Improvement Plan Tool Kit Sheedy, C., & Richard, S. (2020). Patient identification errors in the operating room. In Making healthcare safer III: A critical analysis of existing and emerging patient safety practices. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555511/  This book chapter discusses patient identification errors in operating rooms. The study highlights that a review of 106 articles showed that wrong patient practices account for almost 0.9-1.86% of patient misidentification. The errors occur during surgery due to communication barriers, wristband errors such as removed wristbands, or absence of wristbands. After discussing the factors leading to the wrong patient and wrong-site surgery due to the misidentification of patients, the article highlights the methods to promote patient safety practices by emphasizing patient identification. These methods include implementing checklists and protocols such as the JC Checklist and the World Health Organization’s checklist for safe surgery. Other methods included marking the surgery site among patients with an indelible pen to avoid errors due to patient misidenfticiation. Additionally, the study considered using verification protocols and forms for accurate patient identification before surgery. These methods were effective in lowering the rates of surgical errors due to wrong patient identification. This study is useful for nurses to understand how patient identification errors occur in operating rooms. Moreover, healthcare professionals can find this resource valuable as it suggests methods to prevent surgical errors due to the misidentification of patients. By implementing these practices, healthcare professionals, including surgeons and nurses, can alleviate surgical mistakes and promote patient safety. NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 4 Improvement Plan Tool Kit Romano, R., Marletta, G., Sollami, A., La Sala, R., Sarli, L., Artioli, G., & Nitro, M. (2021). The safety of care focused on patient identity: An observational study. Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis, 92(Suppl 2), e2021038. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11328  This article focuses on patient safety care from the perspective of patient identity. The study was performed to evaluate nursing students’ knowledge regarding the correct identification of patients. The study showed homogeneity in considering the correct patient identification protocols applicable within the internship. The study considered bracelet identifiers as the most beneficial strategy for accurate patient identification. This resource is helpful for nurses as it shows them the patterns of knowledge of patient identification among nursing students and how various methods and strategies can be used, as stated by the article. Further, the article is valuable as it educates nurses on using patient identifiers like bracelets to prevent errors in patient identification. It guides nursing educators on ways to improve the attitude of nursing students toward patient identification during internship programs. Patient Identification Errors Abraham, P., Augey, L., Duclos, A., Michel, P., & Piriou, V. (2021). Descriptive Analysis of Patient Misidentification From Incident Report System Data in a Large Academic Hospital Federation. Journal of Patient Safety, 17(7), 1. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000478  The article by Abraham and colleagues (2021) analyzes patient identification errors using incident report systems data. The resource found various factors that contributed to patient misidentification. The most frequently occurring errors were due to missed wristbands, which accounted for 34% of errors. Other contributing factors were wrong labeling, wrong charts, and administrative errors. This resource is useful for healthcare staff, including nurses, to gain insights into why patient identification errors occur and what factors lead to the

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 3 Improvement Plan in Service Presentation

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 3 Improvement Plan in Service Presentation Name Capella university NURS FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety Prof. Name Date Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation Hi everyone, I am —–, and I work at Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children as a baccalaureate-prepared nurse and team lead role; I am mentoring today’s session on an improvement plan. This safety improvement plan in-service presentation stemmed from evaluating the root-cause analysis of recently growing patient-identification error issues. I hope you all have a learning session today and practice more vigilantly to prevent the incidence of patient identification errors for children at our hospital. Agenda and Outcomes  I will talk about the purpose and goals of the in-service session, the processes that need to be improved related to patient identification, and the role of the audience in addressing this safety concern. Moreover, I will also create resources and activities to encourage skill development and better comprehension of newly implemented processes. By the end of this session, the audience will have enhanced knowledge of preventing patient identification errors and hands-on experience with the technologies to be used. Moreover, they will be educated on protocols for patient identification to avoid errors.  Purpose and Goals of Patient Identification Safety Presentation My aim for today’s presentation is to raise awareness among the healthcare workforce and administrative staff to prevent patient identification due to human errors and technological constraints. Additionally, the purpose of this session is to mitigate the risks associated with misidentification, which can lead to severe consequences such as medication errors, delays in care, incorrect treatments, and compromised patient safety (Rodziewicz & Hipskind, 2020). Our ultimate goal is to decrease the incidence of patient identification errors by 50% within one year. Additionally, the goal is to enhance the adherence to established patient identification protocols and procedures by 80% among healthcare and administrative staff. These goals are established by considering the SMART goal strategy, where goals are specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and time-bound (Jeong et al., 2021). Safety Improvement Plan Overview of the Current Problem  Currently, our healthcare organization has been tackling patient identification errors. Now, a root-cause analysis for one of these patient identification errors was performed due to the high emerging rates of this problem. The two patients, Julia and Jenny, came for vaccination, and their bracelet identifiers were replaced due to administrative errors. As a result, patients acquired the wrong vaccines, experienced adverse reactions, and increased susceptibility to diseases. The nurses also paid no heed to verifying patients before administering vaccines. The overall incident led the administrative team to delve into the root cause of the problem and create a plan to reduce these errors. Proposed Plan The proposed safety improvement plan includes implementing a barcode system, developing standardized protocols and checklists for double patient identification verification, and training staff, particularly the administrative and healthcare workforce. The barcode system will designate a barcode identifier for each patient and promote correct identification of the patient as the same barcode is assigned to the medication to be administered (Barakat & Franklin, 2020). This will reduce the onset of patient misidentification and enhance patient safety. Additionally, the healthcare administration will develop standards or protocols for patient identification, such as double verification and following the five rights of medication administration, where identifying the right patient is mandatory (Romano et al., 2021). The training sessions for healthcare and administrative staff will be performed to educate all relevant and responsible members on patient safety and the need for patient identification. This safety improvement plan will effectively boost patient safety in our organization (Romano et al., 2021). Need for Improving Safety by Avoiding Patient Identification Errors There is a pressing need for integrating new processes to improve patient safety by reducing identification errors. One of the significant reasons is that patient identification errors contribute to a substantial threat to safety of patients. They can lead to onset of adverse events like medication errors, compromised care treatments, and increased healthcare costs (Rahmawati et al., 2020). An evidence-based study states that about 236 patient identification errors occurred on losing their bracelet identifier (Rahmawati et al., 2020). By preventing these errors, patients will have better health outcomes as they receive correct care treatments and reduce healthcare costs. This requires reviewing incident reports and tracking the organization’s frequency of patient identification errors. Therefore, patient identification is an essential step towards patient safety, which must be correctly done by integrating relevant processes, protocols, and technologies. Role of Audience and Their Importance The success of the proposed safety improvement plan solely relies on the audience’s significant and active involvement and commitment. All the healthcare workforce and administrative are essential to fulfill the desired goal and achieve the purpose of the improvement plan. Clinical staff, including nurses, doctors, pharmacists, and other personnel, play a crucial role in adhering to new protocols, utilizing technology, and practicing accurate patient identification at every stage of care (Alomari et al., 2020). Since they are the primary caretakers of patients, their keen dedication to follow the new processes and technologies is necessary. Other front-line staff members, including receptionists and aides, are often the first point of contact with patients. Their diligence in following identification protocols is also essential (Burrows, 2020). Hospital administration must champion the improvement plan by allocating resources and creating a culture prioritizing patient safety. NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 3 Improvement Plan in Service Presentation The IT professionals will maintain and update technological solutions such as barcode scanners and overall barcode systems and upgrade EHRs to avoid system flaws (Houtan et al., 2020). The collaborative effort of each audience group is crucial to the success of the improvement plan. The organization will celebrate unified success with every milestone by implementing an improvement plan. It is crucial to address the growing safety concern of patient identification errors at our organization, as leaving them unaddressed can result in higher morbidity and mortality rates due to wrong treatments (Romano et al., 2021). Moreover, they cause high costs to the healthcare

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 Root Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 Root Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan Name Capella university NURS FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety Prof. Name Date Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan This assessment highlights the issue of patient identification errors prevailing in Arnold Plamer Hospital. This hospital is dedicated to serving children, particularly providing pediatric healthcare services. In this hospital, the emerging patient-identification errors have impacted the health of many children. This paper will delve into root-cause analysis of misidentified patients and errors in patient identification. Furthermore, the safety improvement plan will be developed to address the growing issue. Analysis of the Root Cause In Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, one fine day, two pediatric patients named Julia and Jenny came for vaccination. Their identification bracelets were mistakenly swapped, and Julia received the vaccinations intended for Jenny and vice versa. The nurse administering the vaccinations detected the error when Julia’s medical history did not match the Electronic Health Records (EHR) information. The nurse realized the patient’s identification did not match the digital records, prompting further investigation. This misidentification of patients affected both patients as Julia received vaccines that were not suited to her medical condition and experienced some allergic reactions as adverse effects. Similarly, Jenny was at risk of contracting diseases due to missed vaccinations, which her health condition required. Additionally, this incident caused anxiety and distress for the families involved, eroding trust in healthcare systems. The standard protocol for patient identification during vaccination needed to be followed. The nurse did not verify the patient’s identity by cross-checking identification bracelets and EHR data to execute the further vaccination procedure properly. Furthermore, there needed to be more communication between the administrative staff responsible for assigning patient identification bracelets and the nursing staff responsible for administering the vaccinations (Romano et al., 2021). Moreover, the hospital’s vaccination department’s high workload and fast-paced nature must have contributed to the oversight and resulted in this event. Lastly, the EHR system failed to raise an alert for a mismatch in patient identification, highlighting a potential flaw within the technology and requiring further upgrades and feature installation (Riplinger et al., 2020). Hence, the root-cause analysis indicates the procedural breakdowns, communication gap, human and environmental errors, and the need for an upgraded EHR system with better-aligned features. Application of Evidence-Based Strategies Patient identification errors impact patient safety and require implementing evidence-based strategies to ensure patient safety by delivering correct care treatments to the right patients. These strategies include using a Barcoding System to correctly identify the patients for medication administration and other therapies such as surgeries. The barcode system allows healthcare professionals to give a patient a specific barcode as an identifier in the form of a wristband and deliver care treatments based on the barcode allotted (Barakat & Franklin, 2020). One example of this system is Barcode Medication Administration, in which the barcode of a patient’s wristband is matched with a barcode on the medication to administer the correct medication to the right patient without making an error in patient identification (Owens et al., 2020). Literature states that about 236 patient identification errors occurred when patients lost bracelet identifiers (Rahmawati et al., 2020). This required a robust identification system for patients, such as biometric systems such as iris biometric systems where iris scanning for each patient is conducted to store as a template. This scanned template matches the patient for routine care treatment deliveries (Anne et al., 2020). NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 Root Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan Other strategies include developing and enforcing standardized protocols for patient identification, including using checklists for verification. Implementing these checklists during patient encounters will reduce the incidence of patient misidentification, particularly before administering medications or vaccines (Riplinger et al., 2020). Moreover, healthcare professionals must establish regular communication channels, such as huddles or briefings, to discuss patient identification protocols and address any concerns or challenges the healthcare team faces. Furthermore, healthcare professionals must be trained on the importance of patient identification and ways to mitigate human errors that lead to patient harm (Vaismoradi et al., 2020). By implementing these strategies substantiated by literature and studies, patient identification errors can be effectively reduced, enhancing patient safety and facilitating patient experience. Improvement Plan with Evidence-Based and Best-Practice Strategies The safety improvement plan can effectively solve patients’ misidentification and subsequent implications of impaired patient safety. This plan will include implementing enhanced barcoding technology, developing standardized protocols and checklists for patient identification, and training for healthcare staff. The hospital administration will integrate an advanced barcoding system that extends beyond medication administration to include patient identification bracelets. The healthcare facility can ensure robust verification by expanding barcoding technology to patient identification, reducing misidentification risk (Romano et al., 2021). Healthcare leadership will play a role in developing and enforcing standardized protocols and checklists for patient identification, emphasizing barcode scanning as a crucial step. Combined with checklists, these procedures create a systematic approach to patient identification and reduce the likelihood of errors. Lastly, the plan will include implementing ongoing human factors training for healthcare, where leaders will emphasize the importance of attention to detail in patient identification. NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 2 Root Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan Educating staff on common human errors that lead to patient identification errors will empower them with strategies to prevent these errors and enhance the safety culture (Romano et al., 2021). The desired outcomes of this safety improvement plan are reducing patient identification errors, enhancing patient safety, improving patient and family satisfaction, and increasing staff awareness and competence in patient identification. The timeline for the proposed improvement plan will be about one year. In the first two months, the healthcare organization will assess current patient identification processes and areas for improvement. In months 3-4, administrative staff will procure and implement an advanced barcoding system for the identification of patients. This will be followed by developing and disseminating standardized protocols and initiation of training for healthcare staff and administrative personnel in the next two months

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 1 Enhancing Quality and Safety

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 1 Enhancing Quality and Safety Name Capella university NURS FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety Prof. Name Date Enhancing Quality and Safety Improvement Nurses play a vital role in enhancing patient quality and safety as they primarily deliver care treatments through medication administration and monitoring (Alomari et al., 2020). In Arnold Palmer Hospital, patient safety issues of patient identification errors are growing tremendously, impacting several patients regarding medication and treatment errors. Therefore, this assessment will delve into improving patient safety issues of identification errors and incorporate evidence-based solutions to promote patient safety and care coordination. Factors leading to Specific Patient-Safety Risks Patient safety is essential to consider while delivering healthcare services in healthcare organizations. One of the significant patient safety risks is associated with errors in patient identification as they can pose grave risks to patients, such as the provision of wrong treatment leading to health deterioration (Bell et al., 2020). Various factors contribute to the onset of patient identification errors, such as manual data entry errors, lack of standardized patient identification protocols, and incomplete or outdated Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The manual data entry of patient information can lead to misinterpretation due to illegible handwriting or typographical mistakes. These mistakes can lead to patient identification errors (Bell et al., 2020).   Inconsistent identification protocols across multiple healthcare facilities can contribute to dilemmas and mistakes. Hence, a lack of standardized procedures increases the likelihood of misidentification. Furthermore, incomplete or outdated information in EHRs can result in misidentification. This can occur when patient records are not regularly updated with accurate demographic details. Physicians are also prone to entering wrong-patient order entries, as one study relates that these errors happen for almost 600,000 patients with wrong order entries in the U.S. (Salmasian et al., 2020). Evidence-Based Practice Solutions for Patient Identification Errors to Enhance Patient Safety and Diminish Costs It is paramount to address patient identification errors as they can lead to poor patient safety and incidence of medication and treatment errors. For this purpose, applying evidence-based practices to avoid patient identification errors is mandatory. One of these evidence-based practice solutions is implementing barcode systems within the organization. The use of barcoding systems for patient identification has proved to reduce medication errors and enhance the rates of patient identification. One study finds that using barcode medication administration technology increased patient identification rates from 74% to 100% and reduced medication errors (Barakat & Franklin, 2020). Another strategy is integrating biometric technologies such as fingerprint or palm vein recognition to promote accurate patient identification. Another novel biometric technique researchers utilize is iris recognition systems for correct and accurate patient identification. This solution involves acquiring patients’ iris images, storing the features as iris templates, and matching them with patients’ iris for identification (Anne et al., 2020). Lastly, it is emphasized that hospital organizations must develop standardized patient identification protocols to reduce identification errors and improve patient safety (Riplinger et al., 2020). These technologies and evidence-based strategies can potentially increase patient safety by reducing identification errors. Moreover, costs can be effectively reduced by preventing costs associated with adverse events and rework due to errors (Riplinger et al., 2020). Role of Nurses in Improving Patient Safety and Reducing Costs  Nurses have an enormous role in care coordination to facilitate patient safety and limit costs mainly related to risks leading to patient identification errors. They can ensure adherence to patient identification protocols during various healthcare interactions such as admissions, medication administration, and specimen collection. For example, implementing the “two-patient identifier” rule, where nurses consistently use at least two unique identifiers for patients, such as names and birth dates, before administrating medications, helps reduce the risk of patient identification errors during medication administration (Simamora, 2020). Nurses can actively use technologies such as barcoding systems during their daily tasks to ensure accurate patient identification. For example, scanning a patient’s wristbands and medication barcodes before administering medications helps verify patient identity and medication match, which reduces the likelihood of errors (Owens et al., 2020).  Nurses can encourage patients and their family members to participate in their care by verifying their own identities and information. Patient safety is enhanced by educating patients to confirm their names and birthdates during interactions with healthcare providers, as empowered patients perform additional layers of identification (Simamora, 2020). Lastly, nurses can contribute to quality improvement initiatives to identify and mitigate patient identification risks within their healthcare settings. For example, by participating in root cause analysis following a patient identification error incident, nurses help assess system weakness and enable the implementation of corrective actions to prevent similar errors in the future (Vaismoradi et al., 2020). By coordinating care with relevant stakeholders, nurses can perform strategies to reduce identification errors and reduce costs associated with medication errors and adverse events due to misidentified patient cases (Simamora, 2020). Nurses’ Collaboration with Other Stakeholders Nurses must coordinate and collaborate with relevant stakeholders to adequately and appropriately address patient identification errors to enhance patient safety and reduce associated costs. The identified stakeholders for this purpose will be physicians, pharmacists,  Health Information Technology (HIT) professionals, quality improvement teams, and hospital administrators. Physicians and pharmacists are involved in prescribing and dispensing medication. Coordinating with them ensures alignment in patient identification protocols and reinforces a shared commitment to accuracy. For this purpose, it is essential to communicate with these stakeholders clearly in standardizing identification processes during patient encounters and reducing the risks of errors due to misidentification (Alomari et al., 2020). HIT professionals are responsible for implementing and maintaining EHR systems and technology solutions. Nurses must collaborate with IT officers to ensure the proper functioning of patient identification technologies, such as barcoding systems and biometric tools, to reduce manual errors and enhance accuracy in patient identification. They will also need to coordinate with quality improvement teams as their primary goal is to identify and mitigate risks to overall safety and quality of care (Alomari et al., 2020). Nurses can effectively collaborate with QI officers to address the root causes