Capella 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

Name

Capella university

NURS-FPX 4030 Making Evidence-Based Decisions

Prof. Name

Date

Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

This analysis highlights the importance of an evidence-based approach to expanding knowledge regarding acute pancreatitis. Moreover, the paper discusses the criteria for determining the credibility of resources, examining different sources of information for their credibility and relevance to the diagnosis. Lastly, the paper examines the importance of integrating credible information into an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) model, resulting in improved practices and patient outcomes.

Chosen Diagnosis and Evidence-based Approach

Acute pancreatitis is described as the inflammation of the pancreas, usually caused by stones in the gallbladder or excessive consumption of alcohol. It is one of the life-threatening gastrointestinal health conditions, accounting for approximately 275,000 hospital admissions in the United States. It is estimated that 20% of patients develop acute pancreatitis, leading to a 20-40% death rate (Li et al., 2021). Due to its harmful complications, including organ failure and elevated mortality rate, an evidence-based approach is crucial in managing patients.

Li et al. (2019) define Evidence-based Practices (EBP) as the utilization of best practices available in evidence to derive decisions and provide adequate care to patients, considering their needs and preferences. Managing acute pancreatitis can benefit from evidence-based guidelines, helping clinicians to make informed decisions regarding diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. For instance, early fluid resuscitation is a treatment modality supported by the evidence to prevent hypovolemia and maintain organ perfusion in patients with acute pancreatitis (de-Madaria et al., 2022). Such informed decisions are imperative to improve patient outcomes.

Additionally, an evidence-based approach assists in avoiding unnecessary interventions that may exacerbate patients’ conditions or lead to complications. This is highly important in case of acute pancreatitis to prevent life-threatening outcomes. Through this approach, practitioners ensure that patients receive the most effective and safe care based on the latest scientific evidence, reducing morbidity and mortality and improving patient satisfaction (Li et al., 2019).

Criteria to Determine the Credibility of Online Resources

The CRAAP test is a well-developed criterion used to determine the credibility and relevance of online resources, such as websites, scholarly papers, and journal articles. According to Esparrago-Kalidas (2021), the CRAAP is a mnemonic for currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. The criteria are elaborated below using a specific resource related to acute pancreatitis.

Szatmary, P., Grammatikopoulos, T., Cai, W., Huang, W., Mukherjee, R., Halloran, C., Beyer, G., & Sutton, R. (2022). Acute pancreatitis: Diagnosis and treatment. Drugs, 82(12), 1251–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-022-01766-4

According to the CRAAP test, this resource was published in 2022, demonstrating the up-to-date nature of the information. Moreover, the information is relevant to the search topic, presenting the disease description, diagnostic criteria, and treatment modalities. Additionally, the authors are healthcare professionals and experts in pancreatic medicine. The journal (Drugs) is listed in reputable journals, publishing original research and reviews with an impact factor 11.5. The authors have adequately supported their claims with other valuable and credible sources, representing the accuracy of the information. Lastly, the article aims to expand the knowledge of healthcare professionals.

Credible and Relevant Sources of Information

Various literature studies provide pertinent information on acute pancreatitis’s prevalence, management, and treatment. Some of the studies are presented below, and their credibility and relevance are evaluated based on the CRAAP criteria.

The study by Li et al. (2021) highlights the prevalence of acute pancreatitis, indicating the disease’s burden worldwide, regionally, and nationally. The article completes the CRAAP criteria by its recent publication (2021). It is relevant for public health professionals to understand the burden and plan effectively for public health initiatives and resource allocation. Furthermore, the study was authored by multiple researchers from reputable institutions. Additionally, it is published in BMC Gastroenterology, a peer-reviewed journal, indicating scholarly rigor and authenticity of information. Finally, the study underwent peer review to ensure accuracy and reliability and to report the burden of acute pancreatitis.

Capella 4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources

The study by de-Madaria et al. (2022), published in 2022, holds credibility and relevance based on the CRAAP criteria. The article clarifies its relevance by highlighting fluid resuscitation as a cornerstone in managing acute pancreatitis, offering best practices and up-to-date insights. Authority is evident as the study was conducted by a team of renowned healthcare professionals and gastroenterologists and published in a highly esteemed peer-reviewed journal, the New England Journal of Medicine. The study’s accuracy is also supported by rigorous research methods and the oversight of peer review processes to disseminate information regarding fluid resuscitation as a best practice strategy in acute pancreatitis. This resource is the most useful for healthcare professionals as its findings on fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis directly inform clinical practice to enhance patient care and outcomes.
Another study that discusses the current treatment strategies for acute pancreatitis is credible based on the CRAAP criteria. The study was published in 2024, providing recent insights into treatment strategies for the disease. Directly elaborating on the recent advancements in treatment approaches, this article holds relevance in contributing valuable information to clinical practice and patient care. Thus making it the most useful resource for healthcare professionals to implement the best evidence-based strategies in their healthcare settings. Moreover, the authors possess expertise in gastroenterology and related fields, adding credibility to their research. The information is published in a reputable peer-reviewed journal (The Journal of Clinical Medicine). Consequently, as a peer-reviewed publication, the study underwent rigorous evaluation, demonstrating the accuracy and reliability of its findings (Song & Lee, 2024).

Integrating Credible Evidence into an EBP Model

Integrating credible evidence into an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) model for acute pancreatitis is crucial for ensuring optimal patient outcomes. This model provides a structured approach for researchers and healthcare practitioners to make informed decisions regarding patient care using credible evidence from rigorous research (Brunt & Morris, 2023). By integrating authentic evidence into an EBP model, healthcare providers can enhance the effectiveness of interventions, minimize the risk of complications, and improve patient satisfaction. This approach fosters a systematic and data-driven methodology to patient care, leading to better outcomes and reduced morbidity and mortality associated with acute pancreatitis.

One specific example of incorporating credible evidence for acute pancreatitis is the Johns Hopkins Medicine Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) model. This model works on a three-step process called PET: practice question, evidence, and translation (Brunt & Morris, 2023). For example, our practice question is: In patients with acute pancreatitis, does early enteral nutrition improve clinical outcomes compared to delayed enteral nutrition? According to the model, the next step is to collect the evidence, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials demonstrating the benefits of early enteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis patients.

For instance, a study by Liu et al. (2023) emphasizes the importance of early enteral nutrition in reducing complications, length of hospitalization, and mortality rate in acute pancreatitis patients. Finally, this evidence is translated into clinical practice that involves the implementation of early enteral nutrition initiation within 24-48 hours of admission in line with the standardized guidelines, including staff education. By following this evidence-based approach, healthcare providers can improve patient outcomes, reduce complications, and enhance the quality of care for individuals suffering from acute pancreatitis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, an evidence-based approach is vital to expand the knowledge of healthcare professionals related to healthcare issues and diseases, including acute pancreatitis. However, the evidence must be credible and relevant to the research objective. Thus, the CRAAP criteria assist in examining various sources of information to find credible and authentic information. While searching for credible information is imperative, it is equally important to use an Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) model to translate that information into clinical practice, improving patient outcomes.

References

Brunt, B. A., & Morris, M. M. (2023). Nursing professional development evidence-based practice. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK589676/

de-Madaria, E., Buxbaum, J. L., Maisonneuve, P., García García De Paredes, A., Zapater, P., Guilabert, L., Vaillo-Rocamora, A., Rodríguez-Gandía, M. Á., Donate-Ortega, J., Lozada-Hernández, E. E., Collazo Moreno, A. J. R., Lira-Aguilar, A., Llovet, L. P., Mehta, R., Tandel, R., Navarro, P., Sánchez-Pardo, A. M., Sánchez-Marin, C., Cobreros, M., … Bolado, F. (2022). Aggressive or moderate fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis. New England Journal of Medicine, 387(11), 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2202884

Esparrago-Kalidas, A. J. (2021). The effectiveness of CRAAP test in evaluating credibility of sources. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(2), 1–14. https://i-jte.org/index.php/journal/article/view/25

Li, C., Jiang, M., Pan, C., Li, J., & Xu, L. (2021). The global, regional, and national burden of acute pancreatitis in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019. BMC Gastroenterology, 21(1), 332. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01906-2