NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4 Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

Name

Capella university

NURS-FPX 4040 Managing Health Information and Technology

Prof. Name

Date

 Informatics and Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators

Greetings to all! I am _______, and today, I will be presenting a session on Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators (NSQIs). This training event aims to educate nurses about the significance of NSQIs in the medical field. NSQIs are critical instruments for assessing and enhancing nursing care quality (Liu et al., 2023). NSQIs are quantifiable characteristics of nursing services that have an immediate effect on patient outcomes.

The efficacy, security, and productivity of nursing practices are reflected in NSQIs.  Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers (HAPUs) is one of the example of NSQIs (Thorp et al., 2020). Nurses must monitor and improve these indicators in order to improve the standard of care and encourage patient experiences. Furthermore, by tracking NSQIs, medical facilities can recognize aspects that need to be improved in order to fulfill patients’ expectations for treatment (Liu et al., 2023).

National Database for Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicator 

The National Database for Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQIs) is an important source of data for establishing nursing practice benchmarks. The NDNQIs provide useful information for evaluating nursing outcomes in healthcare unit. NDNQIs cover a wide range of issues, including structure, procedure, and serve as a complete source of knowledge. Furthermore, NDNQIs provide knowledge about ideal nursing care techniques and the corresponding expenses to attain specified goals (Zhang et al., 2021). The purpose of NDNQI is to bring together multidisciplinary groups to strive toward improved patient outcomes by increasing care quality. These measurements also demonstrate the significance of nurses and their procedures in terms of patient health and beneficial medical outcomes (Gupta et al., 2020).

Hospital Acquired Pressure Ulcer 

The HAPU was chosen as the indication on which today’s session is based to educate nurses about the importance of NSQI. HAPUs are among the most hazardous scenarios in the therapeutic setting. PUs, also known as pressure injuries, are defined as wounds to the skin and/or underneath tissue damage caused by exertion of pressure or pressure with stress (Gaspar et al., 2019). HAPUs cause substantial psychological, physical, and societal problems because to patients’ reduced standard of living, increased dependence on others, and fragility. HAPUs raise the expense of health-care services. Although several risk variables have been found, the most common are movement, exertion, cutaneous moisture, nutrition condition, and sensations (Gaspar et al., 2019).

Nurses are largely responsible healthcare providers with the primary responsibility of reducing HAPUs by improving their expertise and practices (Deakin et al., 2023). Managing the areas of pressure of patients is an essential component of nursing care. Nurses must keep patients’ skin in good condition and avoid problems. This is accomplished by identifying high-risk patients early and offering special attention to them, for which nurses must be educated and have an understanding of their inadequate procedures. The satisfactory outcomes for HAPUSs prevention are more likely to occur when multidisciplinary teams collaborate (Deakin et al., 2023).

Role of Interdisciplinary Team

Interdisciplinary teams assist medical organization in providing their services. Thus, data collection and the creation of an organizational report on quality indicators necessitate the collaboration of individuals from multiple fields (Crunden et al., 2022). In this sense, nurses play a crucial part. Nurses, nurse educators, the quality management department, the information technology staff, and administrations are involved in the data collection procedure for HAPUs and the understanding of nurses related to this issue if the incidences are high and necessitate hospital management involvement (Crunden et al., 2022).

The interdisciplinary team can gather and report quality indicator information through coordination. Evidence produced for HAPU can assist multidisciplinary groups in identifying possibilities for improvement. The multidisciplinary group is capable of accurately documenting HAPU events in the patient’s medical records. For reporting and gathering data feedback and questionnaire approaches can also be considered (Field et al., 2019). Medical professionals are also responsible for initiating measures to avoid HAPU, depending on recommendations and according to the specific need of each patient (Gaspar et al., 2019).

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4 Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

Using Electronic Health Records (EHRs), nurses can maintain reliable information on patients with HAPU. They contribute to the collection and documentation of HAPU patient data in ambulatory settings. Nursing informatics aids in the fast retrieval of data that can be used to treat HAPU patients (Nez et al., 2019). The multidisciplinary group can help create and implement Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) that send out real-time warnings and notifications to physicians. The team can use validated methods to assess patients’ HAPU risk and conduct preventive interventions based on evidence-based strategies (Abdellatif et al., 2021).

The information gathered can be evaluated by data specialists. Analysts  evaluate, and comprehend information to transform large amounts of information into unambiguous, useful knowledge. Many medical facilities use Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System (MPSMS) software (Wang et al., 2020). The objective of this system is to document and report any new HAPU cases or previous HAPUs that become severe during the hospital stay. The quality control staff then audits this reporting system to identify high-risk units in the hospital. The data is then shared with the other healthcare providers of each patient unit in order to determine the risk variables affecting nursing treatment (Wang et al., 2020). Gathering and reporting HAPU quality indicator information is critical for identifying areas for reform and developing novel approaches in medical facilities. 

Impacts of the Interdisciplinary Team

The information obtained aids in increasing patient safety via different interdisciplinary initiatives, hence enhancing the organization’s quality metrics. Multidisciplinary participants who collaborate in their areas of expertise will be able to gather information efficiently, evaluate it using various information technologies such as EHR and CDSS, create reports, and successfully implement organizational reforms that enhance patient safety (Etherington et al., 2021). 

The healthcare personnel, as a critical component of the multidisciplinary group, significantly influences collecting data. Nurses are crucial members, communicating with patients and diagnosing their HAPU episodes, which helps to create an accurate data pool (Awad & Hewi, 2020). Data analysts can use advanced analytical methods to detect HAPU incidents. Experts in quality assurance can guarantee that established data-gathering processes are followed and that information is valid and accurate. The multidisciplinary group significantly affects the gathering of data.

The team’s interdisciplinary and comprehensive strategy allows for a greater comprehension of the hazards of HAPU, resulting in evidence-based measures that promote patient safety (Marshall et al., 2022). The team’s work promotes professionalism and security throughout the healthcare setting by encouraging accountability and cooperation in learning (Clarkson et al., 2019).

Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators for Healthcare Organizations

NSQI such as evaluations of nursing excellence and efficacy, are critical for better clinical management. They also influence patient decision-making when it comes to choosing a facility for healthcare (Wolfe et al., 2020). Our medical facility, like other hospitals, delivers great care to patients, particularly in the area of HAPU prevention. A medical service evaluation is necessary in the medical setting to determine possibilities for enhancement and problems related to HAPU. In this setting, the nursing team’s care practices must be assessed to establish the best evidence-based methods and to learn from their experiences to improve care quality (Monaco et al., 2021).

NSQI is an approach for evaluating and assessing nursing practices. These are required for healthcare providers to verify a procedure or therapy for optimal treatment and to monitor information related with particular treatment to improve the HAPU outcomes. These also assess the effects on patients, which are critical for providing high-quality medical services (Oner et al., 2021). NSQIs aid in assessing nurses’ practice productivity; thus, medical professionals should use these NQSIs as evaluating approach to improve the standards of service provided for HAPU (Singh et al., 2019).

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4 Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

Furthermore, they are critical for healthcare assessment by implementing nursing best practices and providing resources for decisions regarding the quality and safety of patients of HAPU. These NQSI help to encourage medical staff to actively engage in healthcare plan development, which is intended to foster excellence in quality care management (Bao et al., 2019).

The NDNQI information aids in the study and evaluation modern nursing procedures. Their practices are linked to patient satisfaction. The hospital can then use this information to set organizational targets for advancement at the person as well as the organization level for preventing HAPU. Nursing leaders can use these NQSI to enhance patient outcomes, reduce adverse effects, and increase patient care, security and satisfaction. These can also teach nurses about providing patient-oriented, secure and effective treatment (Bao et al., 2019).

Evidence-Based Practices (EBP) Guidelines for Nurses

Clinical technology improves the quality and outcomes of medical care. However, nurses must be properly trained in order to use this technology. Nurses contribute to evidence-based treatment, and management. The NSQIs are critical for developing guidelines based on evidence for different advancements in the treatment of patients. NQSI serves as a platform for assessing practice. These indicators help nurses understand their care objectives and make judgments about evidence-based medical interventions (Monaco et al., 2021). 

NQSIs are required for the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) standards for healthcare technologies, including HAPU prevention and control. Developing evidence-based guidelines can help prevent HAPU (Hakami et al., 2023).  These quality indicators provide a framework for nurses to improve their knowledge of new and existing hospital technology, ensuring it is used safely and efficiently for patient care. Doctors and nurses can increase patient satisfaction and a sense of safety through NSQIs. This is because the quality of care nurses deliver is immediately reflected in NSQIs, which promote patient-centered care and a culture of continuous enhancement (Engle et al., 2021).

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4 Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

NQSI helps to improve individual’s satisfaction, health, and standard of life for example, aid in setting therapeutic objectives for HAPUs. It entails reducing the danger of wounds, stabilizing the medical condition, progressing toward closure of wound, and managing related problems. This care plan is developed due to evidence based findings of significant incidence of HAPU in NDNQI (Ebi et al., 2019). The non-contact Pressure Ulcer Monitoring Platform (PUMP) system records patients’ repositioning. It was developed as a result of evidence that demonstrated a substantial number of HAPUs (Minteer et al., 2020).

These quality indicators assist nurses and nurse administrators in detecting vulnerable patients and swiftly relocating these patients (Minteer et al., 2020). Medical professionals can improve patient safety by using NQSI-based evidence-based recommendations for treatment of patients equipment linked to HAPU prevention. It also helps to reduce the number of difficulties linked with medical setting and to improve the quality of care given in healthcare setting (Han et al., 2023). It ultimately improve patient safety and enhance outcomes. 

Conclusion

The knowledge of NSQI including HAPUs is significant for practicing nurses. It improves the treatment quality, patient care and safety. Knowledge of NQSI enhance the collaboration and interaction among multidisciplinary workers encourages and the improved nursing practice to prevent this HAPUs issues in the healthcare setting. These indicators act as a tool and guidelines for nurses, to improve the patient satisfaction. I believe that this session is informative for you all as freshly qualified nurses, and that you learned about nursing quality indicators and their significance

References

Abdellatif, A., Bouaud, J., Lafuente-Lafuente, C., Belmin, J., & Séroussi, B. (2021). Computerized decision support systems for nursing homes: a scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(5), 984-994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.01.080

Awad, W. H. A., & Hewi, S. A. H. (2020). Effect of pressure ulcer preventive nursing interventions on knowledge, attitudes and practices of nurses among hospitalized geriatric patients in Alexandria, Egypt. Journal of Nursing Health Science, 9(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.9790/1959-0902060112

Báo, A. C. P., Amestoy, S. C., Moura, G. M. S. S. D., & Trindade, L. D. L. (2019). Quality indicators: tools for the management of best practices in Health. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 72, 360-366. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0479

Clarkson, P., Worsley, P. R., Schoonhoven, L., & Bader, D. L. (2019). An interprofessional approach to pressure ulcer prevention: a knowledge and attitudes evaluation. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 377-386. https://doi.org/10.2147%2FJMDH.S195366

Crunden, E. A., Schoonhoven, L., Coleman, S. B., & Worsley, P. R. (2022). Reporting of pressure ulcers and medical device related pressure ulcers in policy and practice: A narrative literature review. Journal of Tissue Viability, 31(1), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2021.10.010

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4 Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

Deakin, J., Latimer, S., Walker, R. M., & Gillespie, B. M. (2023). Medical and surgical nurses’ approach to patient pressure injury prevention education: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 32(19-20), 6951-6966. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16814

Ebi, W. E., Hirko, G. F., & Mijena, D. A. (2019). Nurses’ knowledge to pressure ulcer prevention in public hospitals in Wollega: a cross-sectional study design. Bio Med Central nursing, 18(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0346-y

Engle, R. L., Mohr, D. C., Holmes, S. K., Seibert, M. N., Afable, M., Leyson, J., & Meterko, M. (2021). Evidence-based practice and patient-centered care: Doing both well. Health care management review, 46(3), 174. https://doi.org/10.1097%2FHMR.0000000000000254

Etherington, C., Burns, J. K., Kitto, S., Brehaut, J. C., Britton, M., Singh, S., & Boet, S. (2021). Barriers and enablers to effective interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework. PloS one, 16(4), e0249576. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249576

Field, J., Holmes, M. M., & Newell, D. (2019). PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review. Patient related outcome measures, 233-241. https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S156291

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4 Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

Gaspar, S., Peralta, M., Marques, A., Budri, A., & Gaspar de Matos, M. (2019). Effectiveness on hospital‐acquired pressure ulcers prevention: A systematic review. International Wound Journal, 16(5), 1087-1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13147

Gupta, P., Shiju, S., Chacko, G., Thomas, M., Abas, A., Savarimuthu, I., & Andrews, W. (2020). A quality improvement programme to reduce hospital-acquired pressure injuries. British Medical Journal Open Quality, 9(3), e000905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000905

Hakami, A., Hussain, F., Bakheet, A., Alghamdi, K., & AlAtrash, K. (2023). Nursing Research Priorities based on the Nurse-sensitive Indicators: Scoping Review. The Open Nursing Journal, 17(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/18744346-v17-e230508-2023-29

Han, L., Bai, X., Zhang, H., & An, N. (2023). Digital Nursing Quality Management: A Concept Analysis. medRxiv, 2023-07. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.16.23292725

Liu, X., Liu, L., Zhang, J., Meng, X., Huang, C., & Zhang, M. (2023). Construction and evaluation of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for vaginal birth after cesarean: A Delphi study based on Chinese population. Heliyon, 21389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21389

Marshall, V., Qiu, Y., Jones, A., Weller, C. D., & Team, V. (2022). Hospital‐acquired pressure injury prevention in people with a BMI of 30.0 or higher: A scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15882

Minteer, D. M., Simon, P., Taylor, D. P., Jia, W., Li, Y., Sun, M., & Rubin, J. P. (2020). Pressure ulcer monitoring platform—a prospective, human subject clinical study to validate patient repositioning monitoring device to prevent pressure ulcers. Advances in Wound Care, 9(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1089%2Fwound.2018.0934

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4 Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

Monaco, D., Iovino, P., Lommi, M., Marano, G., Zaghini, F., Vellone, E., & Sili, A. (2021). Outcomes of wound care nurses’ practice in patients with pressure ulcers: an integrative review. Journal of clinical nursing, 30(3-4), 372-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15583

Núñez, R. C., Iglesias-Rodríguez, A., Irigoien-Aguirre, J., García-Corres, M., Martín-Martínez, M., & Garrido-García, R. (2019). Nursing records, prevention measures and incidence of pressure ulcers in an Intensive Care Unit. Enfermería Intensiva (English ed.), 30(3), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2018.06.002

Oner, B., Zengul, F. D., Oner, N., Ivankova, N. V., Karadag, A., & Patrician, P. A. (2021). Nursing‐sensitive indicators for nursing care: A systematic review (1997–2017). Nursing open, 8(3), 1005-1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.654

Singh, P., Damodaran, D., Thukral, G., & Joseph, P. C. (2019). The Effectiveness of Home Based Nursing Care in Treatment of Hospital Acquired Pressure Ulcer (HAPU) in Participants Seeking Home Health Services: An Exploratory Study. International Journal of Studies in Nursing, 4(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.20849/ijsn.v4i2.589

Thorp, A., Mangold, K., Dosmann, M., & Waybill, L. (2020). Empowering nurses to engage with transplant quality data and outcomes. Progress in Transplantation, 30(2), 169-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1526924820913508

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4 Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

Wang, Y., Eldridge, N., Metersky, M. L., Sonnenfeld, N., Rodrick, D., Fine, J. M., & Krumholz, H. M. (2020). Association between medicare expenditures and adverse events for patients with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia in the United States. JAMA Network Open, 3(4), e202142-e202142. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2142

Wolfe, J. D., Wolfe, N. K., & Rich, M. W. (2020). Perioperative care of the geriatric patient for noncardiac surgery. Clinical Cardiology, 43(2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23302

Zhang, M., Chen, W., Liu, C., Sui, J., Wang, D., Wang, Y., & Yue, C. (2021). Nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for pernicious placenta previa in obstetrics: A Delphi study based across Chinese institutions. Nursing Open, 8(6), 3461-3468. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.895